Identity Theft Prevention and Survival
I talk with “Privacy Piracy” radio show host Mari Frank about revenge porn and sexual privacy.
Mitchell J. Matorin is directly involved with civil efforts to fight revenge porn, and has written in favor of efforts to criminalize it. He is an attorney whose practice focuses on intellectual property, Internet and computer law.
It is refreshing to see media attention being given to a lawyer who not only fights on behalf of revenge porn victims but also deeply understands the legal, social, and technological complexities of the issue of nonconsensual pornography. For instance, he is appropriately contemptuous of the idea that copyright law can adequately address the problem (“copyright law is something that some of these free speech advocates have pointed to as a valid remedy, and that’s nonsense”), notes that criminalization efforts can help deter this conduct, refuses to engage in victim-blaming, and makes the (depressing but probably correct) observation that recent high-profile male victims may be what it takes for the issue to be taken seriously.
Mary Anne Franks (University of Miami School of Law) has posted Drafting an Effective ‘Revenge Porn’ Law: A Guide for Legislators on SSRN. Here is the abstract: This short document provides an overview of legislative efforts in the U.S. to…
Legislators/activists interested in drafting “revenge porn” legislation may find this guide useful. I will be updating as more laws are proposed and passed.
“‘Where I come from, we holler at women. Sorry if that offends you, but you shouldn’t feel that way. Because, you know, women were put on this earth to satisfy a man, so if she feels offended, she shouldn’t have ever been born.’ He goes on, ‘You don’t believe in the Bible? That’s why Eve was born.’ In addition to the awful biblical justification, he goes on to utilize every sexist bro’s favorite defense of their right to make gross comments with impunity: ‘But, see, you’ve got the freedom of speech. That’s why you’ve got the freedom of speech, to holler if you wanna holler.’ In other words: STOP CHASTISING ME FOR HARASSING YOU ON THE STREET, THOUGHT POLICE!!!!”
Points for candor, I guess.
Learn more at http://www.cardsagainstharassment.com/faqs.html
it has something to do with preserving life’s mystery; with leaving certain things undescribed, unspecified, and unknown; with savoring certain emotions, such as curiosity, surprise, desire, and anticipation. It depends on an intensified sense of life’s preciousness and fragility, and on a Heisenberg-like notion that, when it comes to our most abstract and spiritual intuitions, looking too closely changes what we feel. It has to do, in other words, with a kind of inner privacy, by means of which you shield yourself not just from others’ prying eyes, but from your own. Call it an artist’s sense of privacy.
A lovely, meditative piece by Joshua Rothman on Woolf, solitude, and dignity. A volume could be written just on “the realization that men, but not women, have long been granted a right to solitude.”
One from the Krav Maga archives…
The NRA began lobbying Congress in the 1990s to limit the CDC’s funding after the agency gave financial backing to an independent study that found that keeping a gun in the home was strongly associated with an increased risk of homicide.
According to the former director of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, “The scientific community has been terrorized by the NRA.” When will we learn that people who fear knowledge are not to be trusted?
The Supreme Court has just issued its ruling in the Hobby Lobby contraception case, holding that “closely held corporations” can choose not to provide contraception coverage if they have sincere religious objections to doing so. I’m still processing this disheartening decision, but in the meantime a few reminders about this issues raised in this case:
1. Contraception is health care. Pregnancy is a serious health care condition under ideal circumstances, and a potentially lethal one under other circumstances. Moreover, more than a million women use contraception for medical purposes completely unrelated to pregnancy - to treat endometriosis, ovarian cysts, acne, and other conditions.
2. Hobby Lobby’s claim that some forms of birth control - namely Plan B, Ella, and IUDs - covered by the mandate are abortifacients is completely false.
3. Hobby Lobby’s supposedly sincere religious objection to these forms of birth control is quite recent: its health insurance plan covered Plan B and Ella until 2012.
4. At the time of Hobby Lobby’s newfound religious objection to contraception coverage, the company’s retirement plan had invested more than $73 million in contraception manufacturers.
5. Hobby Lobby has raised no religious objection to covering erectile-dysfunction medication, penis pumps, or in fact any other form of health care used exclusively by men.
Our latest Krav Maga demo video - knife street attack.